The Oppressive Rule of Sheriff Arpaio Extinguished by Lacey and Larkin.

Filed in Business

In the history of Arizona, Joe Arpaio is one of the sheriffs that will never be forgotten for his animosity to which he had subjected the Latinos and the Hispanics during his tenure. Read more: Jim Larkin | Crunchbase and Michael Lacey | Crunchbase

These two groups were immigrants in the country, and so they were perceived by the sheriff’s administration as inferior and ones that were of less value than the Native Americans. Arpaio and his officers who were very loyal to him could arrest and detain the immigrants with no reasonable offense, and no one could ever point out the mistreatments that they faced. Learn more about Jim Larkin and Michael Lacey: http://www.laceyandlarkinfronterafund.org/the-enduring-sins-of-joe-arpaio-michael-lacey-and-jim-larkin-speak-out-in-response-to-trumps-pardon-of-americas-worst-sheriff/ and http://frontpageconfidential.com/michael-lacey-jim-larkin-arpaio-frontera-fund-first-amendment/

This was because members who opposed to the administration were also destined for the same treatment, or even worse. The media houses also remained silent about the issue because they were also afraid of the decisions that Arpaio could take against them if he realized that they were in his opposition.

However, Lacey and Jim Larkin, the two journalists who owned Phoenix News Times, got fed up with the extent to which the sheriff’s administration had reached in the violation of the Latinos’ fundamental rights. They had also established that Joe Arpaio had illegally formed a Grand Jury that he used to execute the opposition and the immigrants once they had been arrested.

Despite knowing what repercussions would follow their whistleblowing, they remained unperturbed and went to the media for publication of the disturbing issues. They disclosed the evil manner in which Joe and his followers were targeting and mishandling the immigrants’ groups in a prejudiced way. They also revealed the existence and misuse of the Grand Jury, something that angered the sheriff.

What followed was the immediate arrest and detention of Michael Lacey and Jim Larkin. They were arrested from their homes on a very chilly night in 2007. They were both locked in cells under heavy surveillance and guard by Arpaio’s officers. The following morning, the public demanded that the two journalists to be released, failure to which they would go to the streets for demonstrations.

The public outcry overpowered the sheriff, and hence Larkin and Lacey were exonerated immediately. Their arrest was very unnecessary because they had not committed any criminal offense. What followed was the duo filing a lawsuit to prosecute Arpaio for violating their fundamental and first amendment rights.

The suit took a prolonged time in the court due to the bureaucratic nature of the county’s administration. However, in 2013, a judge from the Court of Appeal came to the rescue of the two journalists. He ruled that Jim and Lacey had been illegitimately apprehended and so the county government of Maricopa had to pay them $3.7 million to settle the case.

Feedback

Comments (Comments are closed)

One Response to “The Oppressive Rule of Sheriff Arpaio Extinguished by Lacey and Larkin.”
  1. gymreviewed says:

    A lot has been said about how oppressive the days of Sheriff Arpaio has been and Jim and Lacey were at the receiving end of his brutality. Its very surprising that despite all what best essay uk he was still pardoned. This gives a big room for concern, the way it was done leaves many of us with the expression that he has a relationship with the president.